Skin-in-the-Game: Decision Making via Multi-Stakeholder Alignment in LLMs

1Virginia Tech, 2Amazon
ACL 2024

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in tasks such as summarization, arithmetic reasoning, and question answering. However, they encounter significant challenges in the domain of moral reasoning and ethical decision-making, especially in complex scenarios with multiple stakeholders. This paper introduces the Skin-in-the-Game (SKIG) framework, aimed at enhancing moral reasoning in LLMs by exploring decisions' consequences from multiple stakeholder perspectives. Central to SKIG's mechanism is simulating accountability for actions, which, alongside empathy exercises and risk assessment, is pivotal to its effectiveness. We validate SKIG's performance across various moral reasoning benchmarks with proprietary and opensource LLMs, and investigate its crucial components through extensive ablation analyses.

Comparison of COT vs SKIG

Skin in the Game Workflow. Each box signifies a distinct thought, functioning as a unified string of words that forms an incremental pathway to reasoning.

BibTeX

@article{sel2024skin,
  title={Skin-in-the-Game: Decision Making via Multi-Stakeholder Alignment in LLMs},
  author={Sel, Bilgehan and Shanmugasundaram, Priya and Kachuee, Mohammad and Zhou, Kun and Jia, Ruoxi and Jin, Ming},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12933},
  year={2024}
}